I cannot help but find Tristam Shandy to
be one of the most interesting people I have ever “met” in my life. And from
reading his autobiography, I can say that I feel like I have met him. He has a
very unique take on writing, and I can imagine that his speaking voice is very
similar to that which seems to be conveyed through the words on the pages of
both Volumes I and Volume II. While it is clearly not meant to be an easy read
by any means, careful reading allows the reader to understand this character
much better than in a “normal” autobiography. While life events are more
difficult to grasp with this style of writing, his personality is much more
vibrant. Take, for example, Uncle Toby. Tristam diverges midway through Volume
I from the story of his birth to the story of his uncle, whom he learned the
details of his birth from. But instead of finishing one story, before beginning
another, Tristam chooses to continue his stories of his uncle well into Volume
II of the book before finally returning to his birth story. He even
acknowledges this in the first words of Volume II, where he states “I have
begun a new book, on purpose that I might have room enough to explain the
nature of the perplexities in which my uncle Toby was involved, from the many
discourses and interrogations about the siege of Namur, where he received his wound” (p. 58). Tristam then proceeds
to tell of his uncle’s history in the war, hardly acknowledging the fact that
he has yet to finish the story of his birth. Eventually he does return to the
matter.
Tristam Shandy’s story is loved and
hated for its complexity and intrigue. I know I mentioned this in class, but I
would just like to stress again how truly fascinating it is that Tristam was
able to write in a way that was complex enough to have the overwhelming effect
that the autobiography is known for, but also maintain a casualness in his tone
that conveys his confident personality. The entirety of his complex style
relies on the mind of the reader to perceive the story a certain way. He
targets the audience’s attention by alternating between stories such as that of
his birth and of his Uncle Toby. This is crucial. The entire idea of writing
relies on the attention of the reader. And the art of writing is focused on
manipulating and controlling that attention. Tristam Shandy is a master of
attention. Many readers, on first thought, may say they think the author loses
their attention. But what I believe he, in fact, does, is strengthen it. By
diverging from the original story of his birth, Tristam keeps the reader on
their toes, waiting for the story to find its way back. Over time, I found
myself actually understanding more of the novel and not having to re-read as
much material. I believe that Tristam was able to write such a successful
collection of events based on his exceeding ability to manipulate attention.
In fact, the secondary reading from
this week, Attention: Theory and Practice,
by Proctor and Johnson, focuses on the importance of attention. This
reading explains not only some basic principles of attention, but also some
interesting research that has been done, as well as some interesting effects of
attention. According to the paper, Wundt concluded in his early research that
attention is “an inner activity that causes ideas to be present to different
degrees of consciousness” (p.10). In later years, he described his research as
a study of “conscious decision and choice” and he claimed that attention is a
process of “active synthesis” (p. 10). I couldn’t agree more. Attention is
based on the person’s motivation to allocate their concentration or thought to a
specific object or idea. Wundt was obviously understanding the fact that people
can choose what they pay attention to. This relates to the cocktail party
effect, which demonstrates this allocation of attention. I believe that Tristam’s
style of writing works to counteract this. He steers the direction of the
reader’s attention with his shifts in plot and storyline, and this allows him
to maintain the reader’s attention, even though his story is somewhat
confusing. He strengthens this effect with his direct, matter-of-fact tone and
confident persona.
Attention is just one more aspect of
the writing game. I still think that writing is all about manipulation and
presentation of ideas; it isn’t what you write, it’s how you write it. Tristam
Shandy is the epitome of this fact. If you can manipulate the attention of the
reader, you can make them follow any argument you choose to make or any story
you choose to tell.
Hey Karli, I'm doing the make-up comments Prof. Phillips said we should do, so here goes. I love how you analyze Stearne's style here, and I would agree that his switching keeps the reader interested. In nesting his stories like this, you stay hooked and interested, you want to see how he links all this together. I also like your statement that the author is a guide and manipulator of attention, so true! Write on, my good mello.
ReplyDelete